Comparative Analysis of Nanoparticle-Antibody Conjugations: Carbodiimide versus Click Chemistry

Authors: Daniel L.J. Thorek, Drew R. Elias, Andrew Tsourkas

The ability to modify the physical, chemical, and biologic properties of nanoparticles has led to their use as multifunctional platforms for drug delivery and diagnostic imaging applications. Typically, these applications involve functionalizing the nanoparticles with targeting agents. Antibodies remain an attractive choice as targeting agents because of their large epitope space and high affinity; however, implementation of antibody-nanoparticle conjugates is plagued by low coupling efficiencies and the high cost of reagents. Click chemistry may provide a solution to this problem, with reported coupling efficiencies nearing 100%. Although click chemistries have been used to functionalize nanoparticles with small molecules, they have not previously been used to functionalize nanoparticles with antibodies. Concerns associated with extending this procedure to antibodies are that reaction catalysts or the ligands required for cross-linking may result in loss of functionality. We evaluated the efficiency of conjugations between antibodies and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles using click chemistry as well as the functionality of the product. The results were compared with conjugates formed through carbodiimide cross-linking. The click reaction allowed for a higher extent and efficiency of labeling compared with carbodiimide, thus requiring less antibody. Further, conjugates prepared via the click reaction exhibited improved binding to target receptors.

To access this content please select one of the following options:

Login

Login to an existing account

Purchase this article for 35.00 USD (You must login to purchase this article)

Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

Subscribe to this title

Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

Claim access now

For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  1. Helmick L, Antunez de Mayolo A, Zhang Y, et al. Spatiotemporal response of living cell structures in with semiconductor quantum dots. Nano Lett 2008;8:1303-8.
  2. Davis ME, Chen ZG, Shin DM. Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2008;7:771-82.
  3. Pettit DK, Gombotz WR. The development of site-specific drug-delivery systems for protein and peptide biopharmaceuticals. Trends Biotechnol 1998;16:343-9.
  4. Thorek DL, Chen AK, Czupryna J, Tsourkas A. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle probes for molecular imaging. Ann Biomed Eng 2006;34:23-38.
  5. Sun EY, Josephson L, Weissleder R. “Clickable” nanoparticles for targeted imaging. Mol Imaging 2006;5:122-8.
  6. Artemov D, Mori N, Ravi R, Bhujwalla ZM. Magnetic resonance molecular imaging of the HER-2/neu receptor. Cancer Res 2003;63:2723-7.
  7. Choi H, Choi SR, Zhou R, et al. Iron oxide nanoparticles as magnetic resonance contrast agent for tumor imaging via folate receptor-targeted delivery. Acad Radiol 2004;11:996-1004.
  8. Kelly KA, Allport JR, Tsourkas A, et al. Detection of vascular adhesion molecule-1 expression using a novel multimodal nanoparticle. Circ Res 2005;96:327-36.
  9. Tsourkas A, Shinde-Patil VR, Kelly KA, et al. In vivo imaging of activated endothelium using an anti-VCAM-1 magneto optical probe. Bioconjug Chem 2005;16:576-81.
  10. Carter PJ. Potent antibody therapeutics by design. Nat Rev Immunol 2006;6:343-57.
  11. Molday RS, MacKenzie D. Immunospecific ferromagnetic iron-dextran reagents for the labeling and magnetic separation of cells. J Immunol Methods 1982;52:353-67.
  12. Hermanson GT, editor. Bioconjugate techniques. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996.
  13. Kocbek P, Obermajer N, Cegnar M, et al. Targeting cancer cells using PLGA nanoparticles surface modified with monoclonal antibody. J Control Release 2007;120:18-26.
  14. Natarajan A, Gruettner C, Ivkov R, et al. Nanoferrite particle based radioimmunonanoparticles: binding affinity and in vivo pharmacokinetics. Bioconjug Chem 2008;19:1211-8.
  15. Hein CD, Liu XM, Wang D. Click chemistry, a powerful tool for pharmaceutical sciences. Pharm Res 2008;25:2216-30.
  16. Lutz JF. 1,3-Dipolar cycloadditions of azides and alkynes: a universal ligation tool in polymer and materials science. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2007;46:1018-25.
  17. Nandivada H, Jiang XW, Lahann J. Click chemistry: versatility and control in the hands of materials scientists. Adv Mater 2007;19:2197-208.
  18. Baskin JM, Prescher JA, Laughlin ST, et al. Copper-free click chemistry for dynamic in vivo imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:16793-7.
  19. McCarthy JR, Kelly KA, Sun EY, Weissleder R. Targeted delivery of multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 2007;2:153-67.
  20. Kolb HC, Finn MG, Sharpless KB. Click chemistry: diverse chemical function from a few good reactions. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2001;40:2004-21.
  21. Rostovtsev VV, Green LG, Fokin VV, Sharpless KB. A stepwise huisgen cyclo addition process: copper(I)-catalyzed regioselective “ligation” of azides and terminal alkynes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2002;41:2596-9.
  22. Tornoe CW, Christensen C, Meldal M. Peptidotriazoles on solid phase: [1,2,3]-triazoles by regiospecific copper(i)-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions of terminal alkynes to azides. J Org Chem 2002;67:3057-64.
  23. von Maltzahn G, Ren Y, Park JH, et al. In vivo tumor cell targeting with “click” nanoparticles. Bioconjug Chem 2008;19:1570-8.
  24. Sen Gupta S, Kuzelka J, Singh P, et al. Accelerated bioorthogonal conjugation: a practical method for the ligation of diverse functional molecules to a polyvalent virus scaffold. Bioconjug Chem 2005;16:1572-9.
  25. Brennan JL, Hatzakis NS, Tshikhudo TR, et al. Bionanoconjugation via click chemistry: the creation of functional hybrids of lipases and gold nanoparticles. Bioconj Chem 2006;17:1373-5.
  26. Wang Q, Chan TR, Hilgraf R, et al. Bioconjugation by copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne [3 + 2] cycloaddition. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:3192-3.
  27. Gierlich J, Burley GA, Gramlich PM, et al. Click chemistry as a reliable method for the high-density postsynthetic functionalization of alkyne-modified DNA. Org Lett 2006;8:3639-42.
  28. Baio G, Fabbi M, de Totero D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5T with immunospecific contrast agent in vitro and in vivo in a xenotransplant model. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med 2006;19:313-20.
  29. Thorek DL, Tsourkas A. Size, charge and concentration dependent uptake of iron oxide particles by non-phagocytic cells. Biomaterials 2008;29:3583-90.
  30. Zhao M, Kircher MF, Josephson L, Weissleder R. Differential conjugation of tat peptide to superparamagnetic nanoparticles and its effect on cellular uptake. Bioconj Chem 2002;13:840-4.